| | Name | The Sentencing Project |
| | Address | 1705 DeSales St. NW, Washington, DC 20036 |
| | Report Date | 27-Jan-2009 | | Status Description | Active and evaluated |
| | General Donation | 18-Jun-2011 | | Total from | $350.00 |
| | General Category | Currently nominated | General | Defer action or do nothing |
| | Special Donation | Total from Special | $0.00 |
| | Special Category | Ineligible | Special | Defer action or do nothing |
| | The Sentencing Project is a national organization working for a fair and effective criminal justice |
| | system by promoting reforms in sentencing law and practice and alternatives to incarceration. Its work |
| | Summary | is thought to be useful and of good quality. Its lobbying work makes it ineligible for contributions from |
| | our Special Endowment. |
| | Eligible from General Endowment. |
| | Name | Trickle Up Program |
| | Address | 104 West 27th Street, 12th floor, New York, NY 10001 |
| | Report Date | 23-Jun-2003 | | Status Description | Active but not assigned |
| | General Donation | 07-May-2005 | | Total from | $175.00 |
| | General Category | Active but not evaluated | General | Assign to an ad hoc committee |
| | Special Donation | 18-Apr-2007 | | Total from Special | $500.00 |
| | Special Category | Active but not evaluated | Special | Assign to an ad hoc committee |
| | New report on this organization found it eligible and recommended a nomination. It is a form of |
| | Grameen Bank. Another new report is in order. It found it eligible. |
| | Summary |
| | Name | United Farm Workers |
| | Address | P.O. Box 62, 29700 Woodford-Tehachapi Road, Keene, CA. 93531 |
| | Report Date | 12-Sep-2000 | | Status Description | Active but not assigned |
| | General Donation | Total from | $0.00 |
| | General Category | Active but not evaluated | General | Assign to an ad hoc committee |
| | Special Donation | Total from Special | $0.00 |
| | Special Category | Active but not evaluated | Special | Assign to an ad hoc committee |
| | AD HOC REPORT 8/86 ON THIS UNION AND ITS GRAPE BOYCOTT WAS NOT FAVORABLE. |
| | New report 12/94 was not able to get information and recommends finding of "insufficient information". |
| | Summary | New report 9/2000 recommends that it be "not selected". That report has expired. Need new report. A |
| | report has been received and needs to be reviewed. |
| | Sunday, September 02, 2012 | Page 28 of 32 |