The Walter H. McClenon Fund, Inc.

Special Report

Boaz & Ruth

3030 Meadowbridge Rd.

P.O. Box 6129

Richmond, VA  23222

 

            This is a recommendation that we categorize Boaz& Ruth as Eligible and Currently Nominated from both Endowments.

 

            A person jus released from prison has difficulty finding a decent job, a safe home, and healthy relationships. Boaz & Ruth’s main mission is “Rebuilding Lives Through Relationships,” a transitional job and training program. This program includes classes, counseling, and on-the-job training. Boaz & Ruth also empower the physically blighted Highland Park in the North District of Richmond. (an area identified by the National Corrections Reporting Program as one of the areas receiving the most returning non-violent prisoners).   This community revitalization includes the purchase and restoration of run-down properties. In that area they incubate and operate businesses and provide jobs. They connect Highland Park and their program participants to the wider Richmond Community by activities that bridge racial, economic, and geographic barriers.

 

            I have not learned much about their financial situation.  They operate several businesses, including moving, construction, restaurant, catering, and a retail store. Managing any one of them must be challenging; personnel problems must be severe!   Their Spring 2009 newsletter says “Yes, these are tough days, and Boaz &Ruth has not been spared from negative effects of the economic downturn. But with your support we are continuing to help more than 50 men and women move towards self-sufficiency and strengthen the community of Highland Park.”   The same newsletter also says “…the most significant way you can support Boas &  Ruth during this time is to shop at our stores and use the services of our businesses.”

 

            Boaz & Ruth is eligible under our By-laws III D 5 and III D 6—‘rehabilitation of persons under a special handicap” and “economic self-sufficiency of a disadvantaged group.”  Their success may indirectly influence some welfare-oriented legislation, but they don’t seem to do any lobbying. I think that both of our Endowments are eligible to support them. I recommend that we nominate both endowments for such contributions.

 

                                                Paul McClenon    11th of April 2009