Citizens for Global Solutions and Citizens for Global Solutions Education Fund

418 Seventh Street, SE

Washington, DC 20003-2796

 

Citizens for Global Solutions was founded in November 2003 as a partnership between World Federalist Association and Campaign for UN Reform, two organizations which were both previous recipients of contributions from the Walter H. McClenon Fund. The World Federalist Association had last been evaluated by the Board in April 2000 and found eligible for contributions from the General Endowment, and had received contributions of $10 from the unincorporated fund and $110 from the General Endowment, most recently in December 2001.  The Campaign for United Nations Reform had last been evaluated by the Board in September 2002 and found eligible for contributions from the General Endowment, and had received a contribution of $100 in March 2003.

 

In 2005, I wrote (and this is still true):

The partnership results in two corporate entities, the World Federalist Association and the Campaign for UN Reform, becoming a single organization, Citizens for Global Solutions, with a single vision and mission. 

 

The nature of the strategic partnership between two formerly independent organizations results in a relationship similar to that of the Walter H. McClenon Fund General Endowment and the Walter H. McClenon Fund Special Endowment, a 501C4 parent organization and a 501C3 child organization.  The former Campaign for UN Reform, a 501C4 organization, is now the parent body for the Citizens for Global Solutions.  It is a membership organization that elects its own board of directors and officers.  The World Federalist Association, a 501C3 organization, is now the 501C3 affiliate and will also do business as Citizens for Global Solutions Educational Fund.  Its board of directors is appointed by the directors of Citizens for Global Solutions. 

 

The 2014 vision statement is:

GlobalSolutions.org envisions a future in which nations work together to abolish war, protect our rights and freedoms, and solve problems facing humanity that no nation can solve alone.  To realize this vision, GlobalSolutions.org will build and mobilize a powerful constituency of American who want the United States to take a responsible and cooperative role in the world and who call upon the leadership of the United States and the American people to move us toward a more peaceful, just, and lawful world. 

 

The 2014 mission statement is:

This mission frames the scope of GlobalSolutions.org’s advocacy.  GlobalSolutions.org will focus on policies, institutions, and efforts that advance international peace, justice, sustainability, and the rule of law. 

 

Citizens for Global Solutions, the 501(c)(4) organization, has received contributions from the General Endowment of $300.  Citizens for Global Solutions Education Fund, the 501(c)(3) organization, has received contributions from the Special Endowment of $250.00.

 

In 2012, I requested information about both Citizens for Global Solutions (the 501(c)(4)) and Citizens for Global Solutions Education Fund (the 501(c)(3)).  In 2012, we received information only about Citizens for Global Solutions Education Fund.  We categorized it as ineligible for contributions from the General Endowment, and as “not selected for other reasons” for contributions from the Special Endowment. 

 

The 2014 statement lists activities of: a Stop the War on International Law campaign, criticizing the Senate’s failure to ratify multiple human rights treaties in more than a decade,:a project on Responsibility Not to Veto, saying that permanent members of the Security Council should not use the veto when dealing with atrocities or genocide; and an International Climate Action program.  (The Responsibility Not to Veto project is either oriented toward changing the UN charter or toward Russia and China.  It isn’t clear which.  The United States has introduced the vetoed resolutions condemning atrocities.)  The list of 2014 activities (like the 2012 list) does not provide enough information to illustrate effectiveness.  Perhaps that is because any progress or effectiveness by this organization will have to be accomplished by lobbying (e.g., for the Senate to ratify treaties), and, although we requested information from the 501(c)(4), we did not receive it.

 

This committee has an audited financial statement for the Citizens for Global Solutions Education Fund, the 501(c)(3) organization.  It shows unrestricted support and revenues of $463,000, of which $367,000 or 79% was contributions, $87,000 or 19% was foundation support, and the rest was other.  Expenses were $690,000, of which $532,000 or 77% was for program services, $94,000 or 14% was for management and general, and $63,000 or 9% was for fund-raising.  These are reasonable ratios.  However, this is a small organization, and may not be large enough to be effective.  Although we requested a financial statement from Citizeens for Global Solutions, the 501(c)(4) organization, we did not receive one.

 

Contributions to Citizens for Global Solutions and its educational fund are eligible for contributions based on bylaws 3D1 and 3D2, which authorize contributions for "cooperation between and among potentially hostile groups" and for "economic, social, industrial, or political reform".  However, Citizens for Global Solutions engages in lobbying.  Bylaw 3G1 states that contributions from the Special Endowment may not be made to:  "any organization which engages in lobbying or attempts to influence legislation."   

 

The Board should categorize Citizens for Global Solutions  as “ineligible” for contributions from the Special Endowment.  I recommend that Citizens for Global Solutions Education Fund be categorized for contributions from the General Endowment as “not selected for other reasons” (doubts as to how much the organization is accomplishing).  Since we have made two efforts to obtain information from the 501(c)(4) organization, Citizens for Global Solutions, we should categorize it as having failed to provide sufficient information for evaluation for contributions from the General Endowment. 

 

                        Respectfully submitted,

 

 

 

                        Robert McClenon

                        16 June 2014